AI photo feedback template: examples you can adapt
A comment format with SKU, version, reference and expected correction, plus examples for color, fit and video continuity reviews.
DELFI ·
review feedbackai fashion photosuseful commentsquality controlai fashion videopremium catalogon brand contentdelfiai virtual talent
Cover image: production by DELFI for Topper.
Use this template to write a specific correction comment. Replace the example details with your collection’s file, SKU, variant and reference. Each comment should identify an observable defect and the expected result.
From vague to actionable
Before: “The garment looks strange.”
After: “In the front photo, the right shoulder drops more than in the physical reference; match the shoulder line.”
Before: “The color does not work.”
After: “The blue variant looks more saturated than the approved sample; use SKU 214-A as the reference.”
Before: “The video has an error.”
After: “At 00:04, the logo changes shape during the turn; preserve the reference embroidery.”
To establish the criteria before filling in the fields, read AI photo feedback: how to manage review and close corrections.
Recommended format
- File, SKU and variant.
- View or exact timestamp.
- Affected attribute.
- Approved reference.
- Requested correction.
- Priority and owner.
Write one idea per comment and use a shared taxonomy: color, fabric, fit, pose, styling, background or continuity. This makes patterns across batches visible.
DELFI incorporates feedback within production and human review; the brand defines the final approval criteria.
A comment ready to use
- File, SKU and version:
- View or video timestamp:
- Attribute that does not match:
- Reference showing the difference:
- Correction, priority and owner:
If a preference changes, state whether it applies to one asset or the entire batch.
Continue reading
- Approval and Rejection in AI Photos: How to Turn Feedback into Continuous Improvement
- How to approve AI fashion photos and videos: fabric, fit and detail
Your next collection
At DELFI, feedback connects an observable defect with what the shopper needs to understand. It should support brand direction, not replace it with isolated opinions.
What product do you want to promote, and what does its shopper need to see? Use that answer to agree the talent, usage and production scope.